Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Stone Betrays Business, Again

In an earlier post, I wrote about Ald. Stone's corrupt practice of delaying the opening of a proposed business while the businessman paid rent on the property so that campaign signs for the alderman could be displayed during the election. The rational for this seemed to be because Stone didn't want to push through an unnecessary, but controversial, zoning change at the height of the campaign.

Now we get word that Stone will oppose the zoning change and will recommend that the businessman withdraw the zoning request. Five months after the businessman "cut a deal" with the alderman. Five months of rent paid for empty space.

We sometimes wonder why the 50th Ward gets passed over by new businesses like grocery stores, retail chains, coffee shops and small boutiques. But Stone's using of a small businessman this way, misleading him, enducing a "favor" from him, taking control of his property, and then abandoning him after Stone no longer needs him, can only contribute to this. It surely can't help.

You can't trust Stone. Period.

Not only does Stone have a history of misleading people, such as his recommendation that the business required a zoning change in the first place, but he has a history of not keeping his promises.

Another businessman has now learned this lesson about our alderman. And he is poorer for it.

Granted, the alderman could still decide to grant a special exemption that will allow the proposed Tattoo Parlor to open. You just never know. Because you can't trust Berny Stone. You just can't.

76 Comments:

At May 29, 2007 1:58 PM, Anonymous having it both ways said...

If you have any evidence of wrongdoing, you should go to the state's attorney. All this talk about corrupt practices and favors is totally unfounded.

Besides, an illegal contract is unenforceable and I'm sure Stone gave the money back.

 
At May 30, 2007 5:27 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If this is true why doesn't someone orchestrate impeachment against Bernie?

 
At May 30, 2007 8:54 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is another one of Jays stories. No facts here just word of mouth. Yes you have to get zoned for a tattoo parlor if zoning is not there also get the community input which Bernie did. I dont see Bernie making a promise of a tattoo parlor without the community input, which was the final word.Jay again get the story straight, your pulling at straws again. I dont see the person coming forward who claims to be cheated out of anything. Where are you getting your information from if this is true?

 
At May 30, 2007 10:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

No facts? Anyone who drove up Western saw that signs. There was a "for rent" sign in the window in December. Got taken down around the timne Jay said.

Jay's story makes more sense than anything else. I can't think of a reason why a business would rent space and keep it empty for five months, or put up signs for a candidate in the middle of a heated election. There has to be a reason. We see the lack of new businesses on Western and Touhy. Stone's to blame somehow, whether he is too demanding or too negligent. Both should benefit from the traffic to Devon, but they don't.

 
At May 30, 2007 12:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

For those who Hate Stone and continue to bash him on a daily basis,he can do no right.THE CITIZENS OF THE 50th WARD are sick of the LIES and FALSE ACCUSATIONS against a GREAT MAN by a bunch of BITTER EXTREMIST POWER-HUNGARY LOSERS!

 
At May 30, 2007 12:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Still No Facts. So a for rent sign came down that does not tell me shit. Nor do the false statements made here.You can't open a store without being properly zoned for it and the community should agree. Are you against the community input?
If so then the tattoo shop should go in then we have 1 less empty store front.

 
At May 30, 2007 2:11 PM, Anonymous St. Louis Ave said...

Can anyone provide another explanation for why someone would rent space for five months, keep silent about it for four, and only start the process for opening a business in the fifth month? This is fishy, and more needs to be written about it.

BTW, there is new business development in the 50th. Not Touhy or Western, but Lincoln and McCormick is thriving.

 
At May 30, 2007 2:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Berny Stone is a GREAT MAN!

And Fred Roti, he was a MODEL CITIZEN!

And Donald Tomczak, he was a GOOD MAN!

And Robert Sorich, he was INNOCENT!

And Al Sanchez, he was a GREAT COMMISSIONER!

And Eddie Vrdolyk, he was a GREAT LEADER!

 
At May 30, 2007 2:50 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

St. Louis Ave said...
Can anyone provide another explanation for why someone would rent space for five months, keep silent about it for four, and only start the process for opening a business in the fifth month?

Yes This is insane. Like I asked before I don't see the person who wanted to open the store come forward, what's up with that??
Thase are again false Accusations.
Is this person stupid? Has no brain? Who is talking to this so called store owner? Jay Tell us. You started this blog, again with no positive facts.

 
At May 30, 2007 3:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

5/5/06 Wigoda & Wigoda, zoning attorneys for tattoo artist, pay $500.00 to Democratic Club of the 50th Ward, Bernard L. Stone - Chairman, Ilana Feketitsch - Treasurer

2/22/07 Wigoda pays $250.00 to Bernard L Stone Campaign Committee.

2/27/07 Tattoo parlor rezoning unfortunately delayed by incompetence of Stone re-election effort.

4/24/07 Stone re-elected to historic 10th term

5/4/07 Wigoda introduces application for zoning change for tattoo artist client

 
At May 30, 2007 3:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I guess it goes to show just because you give money to the campaign you cant bribe the alderman.

 
At May 30, 2007 4:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am a citizen of the 50th ward. I am sick of Stoners defending the criminal record of this scoundrel and attacking other citizens of the 50th Ward who dare to bring this out!

 
At May 30, 2007 7:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

proove it then.

 
At May 31, 2007 6:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And furthermore, as a citizen of the 50th Ward I am sick of these things as well:

1) Russian Jewish immigrants, now prosperous thanks to the public assistance aid American Jews like myself gave them through the JUF, sitting in their Winston Tower condos praising Michael Savage and opposing a Canadian style national health service because "hard working people shouldn't have to help lazy blacks." (This is a verbatim quote from one!)

2) The Editor of "Israelnews" who told me that Bernard Stone deserved re-election because the 50th Ward needed an Alderman with a "mezzuzah on his office door" and because "our leaders told us to re-elect him."

3) Hardcore Stoners who invalidate Mr. Stone's opponents by calling them anti-American leftists or advising them to leave the Ward.

Thanks to these things the 50th Ward is becoming the Mississippi of Chicago, a backward repressive environment akin to Quebec before Premier Jean Lesage's Quiet Revolution in the 1960's.

 
At May 31, 2007 6:04 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

the tattoo parlor will open with a special use permit issued by the zoning board and stone can say he was against a zoning change, so both stone and the business owner come out winners. Remember in the letter stone said he is not going to approve a zoning change, he didn't say he was not going to allow a tattoo parlor. Read between the lines.

 
At May 31, 2007 6:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
I am a citizen of the 50th ward. I am sick of Stoners defending the criminal record of this scoundrel and attacking other citizens of the 50th Ward who dare to bring this out!

May 30, 2007 4:54 PM

I am a citizen of the 50th ward who is sicker, no sickest of hearing all these allegations brought against Alderman Stone with no proof. Just by pulling a donation record here or there does not prove anything. In fact it just miss states or miss uses public records when you try to link to an unproven allegation.


Js over the last nine months has become quite good at this but some onelike Hugh is the master.

Then you put it on a blog and people just rant and rave about it. The life a blogger. (Get a life and do something productice fr your fellow human than sit and rant and rave all day about nothing on a computer)

 
At May 31, 2007 9:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Get a life and do something productice

so

ah

what are u doing here?

show some leadership and GO AWAY!

 
At May 31, 2007 10:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
I am a citizen of the 50th ward. I am sick of Stoners defending the criminal record
May 30, 2007 4:54 PM


I am also A citizen so what?
What criminal record???
Where is the proof??
There just allegations...
I would like to see proof...
You keep reading the bull crap Jay is feeding you, but where are the facts?? If in deed there was a criminal record he would be in jail, or wouldnt be re-elected..

 
At May 31, 2007 10:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

STONE HAS NOT BEEN INDICTED YET!

That PROVES he is as CLEAN as the DRIVEN SNOW!

there's all sort of things this alderman does that are not criminal but are of great interest to the community

shut the f*** up about the criminal record or DON"T READ

if it's OK for Stone to take cash from folks he is doing zoning changes for, surely it's OK for us to talk about it

get used to it or go f*** yourself

if you don't like to reading about Stone's pay-to-play community planning process tell Stone not to take the cash

 
At May 31, 2007 10:44 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"If in deed there was a criminal record he would be in jail, or wouldnt be re-elected."

You need to brush up on your English skills. The complaint that Stone's record is criminal is not the same as saying that Stone has been successfully prosecuted. And your logic does not compute. There are plenty of instances since Stone got elected where alderman who had been re-elected were then sent to jail. Stone looks corrupt, acts corrupt and defends corruption. Don't be too surprised that people think he's corrupt!

 
At May 31, 2007 12:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe You should go F**K yourself I cant believe Jay posted this SHIT. So I will reply in the same manner. Yes people have gone to jail for taking cash but Stone has taken no cash or bribes. There is no evidence of it nor is there any proof. So you can shut the F*c* up. Eat S**t .

 
At May 31, 2007 12:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

STONE HAS NOT BEEN INDICTED!

STONE HAS NOT BEEN CONVICTED!

STONE HAS BEEN RE-ELECTED!

STONE'S SHIT DOESN'T STINK!

 
At May 31, 2007 2:42 PM, Blogger Jay said...

Ald. Stone's collection of cash contributions from the businessmen on Devon, believed to exceed what he's reported, is a commonly- held view. I agree that he should be prosecuted for it. But I also agree that the absence of prosecution for corruption is no proof that Stone is not corrupt. Like he says, this is Chicago. Lots of criminal activity goes unpunished in Chicago. There is no reason to ignore it just because law enforcement (or the press) does.

 
At May 31, 2007 2:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jay said...
Ald. Stone's collection of cash contributions from the businessmen on Devon, believed to exceed what he's reported,

Jay another allegation you cant back up you just spreading rumors. These are all lies. The truth is you are a looser all the people who didnt vote for Stone are loosers. We the 52+ % are the winners. So you can all go F**k yourself,Starting with Jay the bigest trouble maker. True we have the freedom of speech but you should have the facts and be able to back up what you write.

 
At May 31, 2007 3:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

you should have the facts

go read the NY Times

 
At May 31, 2007 6:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Get a life and do something productice

so

ah

what are u doing here?

show some leadership and GO AWAY!

May 31, 2007 9:49 AM

I will if I can get your name and adress so I can picket outside of your home.

 
At May 31, 2007 6:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jay said...
Ald. Stone's collection of cash contributions from the businessmen on Devon, believed to exceed what he's reported, is a commonly- held view. I agree that he should be prosecuted for it. But I also agree that the absence of prosecution for corruption is no proof that Stone is not corrupt. Like he says, this is Chicago. Lots of criminal activity goes unpunished in Chicago. There is no reason to ignore it just because law enforcement (or the press) does.

May 31, 2007 2:42 PM

JS there is a civil law called slander and liable as well

 
At May 31, 2007 6:47 PM, Blogger Jay said...

Could you tell me which ones override my First Amendment rights to political speech? I know you're just resorting to thuggish intimidation, but it might be better suited to meatspace.

 
At May 31, 2007 7:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi,

Just came across your blog, and I thought you folks should be the first to know, we have approved the elevation to Sainthood of Bernard L. Stone!

The best researchers on our papal staff have now thoroughly investigated St. Bernard's long life, and they are convinced he has lived a life WITHOUT SIN!

Naturally, I was at first skeptical of considering a candidate of the Jewish persuasion, but my staff assured me he was not particularly observant.

We received a very moving letter of nomination from a young Ms. I. Feketisch, who seemed very familiar with St. Bernard from both family and work perspectives. She included several photographs, and our researched were convinced of the Divine Hand in the astonishingly immaculate state of preservation of St. Bernard's mortal flesh.

We are also in receipt of a very convincing letter from a local real estate investor, who was delighted to relate how St. Bernard obtained $5 dollars US from property taxpayers, with not even so much as a squeal, and used it to transform a $10 million dollar shopping mall into a $40 million dollar shopping mall, describing it as a nothing short of a MIRACLE, and, after looking into it, we have to agree!

Congratulations to St. Bernard and all who are blessed to know him!

Joe Ratzinger
His Holiness Pope Benedictus XVI

 
At June 01, 2007 6:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jay said...
Could you tell me which ones override my First Amendment rights to political speech? I know you're just resorting to thuggish intimidation, but it might be better suited to meatspace.

May 31, 2007 6:47 PM

News flash Jay the First Amendment is not absolute like yelling fire in say the movie theater at Devon and McCormick.. go try to yell fire in there and I am sure you will blame Alderman Stone for your arrest, conviction and having to do community service.

Sorry Jay but you can't say what ever you want about who every you want, when ever you want and not have consquences. Some are legal, some our moral etc.

You may have to back up your stories or facts and if you can't thats when you have problems. I thought you may have learned that from Hugh.

 
At June 01, 2007 7:59 AM, Blogger Jay said...

You think yelling fire in a theater is political speech? I sure don't.

All I want is the facts, not your opinion. Which libel laws override my First Amendment rights to political speech? It's a simple question.

 
At June 01, 2007 9:37 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

speaking of yelling, ever heard the one about the boy who cried wolf?

don't you feel just a little silly posting here for almost a year now threatening people with lawsuits?

think that's likely to work, scaring people into silence?

you're a school-yard bully

bring it or shut up

 
At June 01, 2007 11:22 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous v. Anonymous
That would be an interesting case.

 
At June 01, 2007 3:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

my money is on anonymous

 
At June 01, 2007 8:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is truly amazing to what ends the Stone-haters are going in their continuous assault on the Alderman.Jay,you are playing " propaganda minister" for some real hateful people.What are you doing? Why have you become so obsessed,in Hugh's league,that you twist and distort to reach libelous false accusations?In your(and your fellow Stone-Hater's) America,are people guilty until proven innocent? One Stone--basher even complained about being called an Anti-American Leftist-well,if someone is assumed guilty unless he/she proves their innocence,aka proving a negative,that's Un-American.When the shoe fits--- Today's "Progresive"Liberals/Far-Left are Un-Americanand Anti-American, and there is a vipers nest of them , here!

 
At June 01, 2007 11:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jay said...
All I want is the facts,

Your the idiot who started this Blog. Where are the Facts??

All the shit you post is False and made up or half true.You have just admit you are looking for the facts so why make this post without the facts??
You are a true idiot!!!
LOL

 
At June 02, 2007 11:41 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

> False and made up or half true.

HALF true?

Wow, we are actually making progress!

Suggestion for you, maybe you are now ready for this: perhaps it might be best if the alderman avoids behaviors that might have the APPEARANCE of impropriety?

If Stone never took cash from the folks who benefit from his legislative agenda we would have NOTHING to blog about, would we?

 
At June 02, 2007 1:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I mean, you know & I know that when the alderman takes cash from someone seeking a zoning change, it has NO effect on his decision, he ALWAYS does whats best for the community, he has said so, and I believe him of course, but, let's face it, some people are as you say IDIOTS and just don't get it and never will. Since there are so many IDIOTS in the neighborhood, maybe the thing to do is avoid the sorts of things that set them off? The aldermen can shut down this offense speech ANY TIME HE WANTS TO. All he has to to is implement a policy: "You are free to work as a zoning lawyer on issues in the 50th ward, and you are free to contribute to my political campaign, but you may not do both." We're done!

 
At June 02, 2007 3:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You single out the Alderman because he is the Alderman. If Naisy had become Alderman she would have been in the same boat, as all Alderman Mayor etc are. Thats the Fact!!

 
At June 02, 2007 3:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

IF Naisy had become Alderman she would have been in the same boat, as all Alderman Mayor etc are. Thats the Fact!!

that's not a fact

it's a hypothetical

do you know the difference?

you're pretty fast & loose with what you call facts

 
At June 02, 2007 3:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

the same boat, as all Alderman Mayor etc are.

all politicians are corrupt

they're all on the take

so Stone is OK

you are talking more about yourself & your own expectations of your elected officials then you are about facts

 
At June 02, 2007 3:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You single out the Alderman because he is the Alderman.

absolutely!

 
At June 04, 2007 7:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jay said...
You think yelling fire in a theater is political speech? I sure don't.

All I want is the facts, not your opinion. Which libel laws override my First Amendment rights to political speech? It's a simple question.

June 01, 2007 7:59 AM

Jay I am leaving your little blogging world for the real world of work, volunteering to better the community and family. om my way out I will be calling 311 to report Hugh's numerous building violations on his house.( it is my civic duty)

You can sit here and blog away to your hearts content blasting/slandering/liabling whom ever you want. However it looks like fewer and fewer an reading your blog. It is like a low rated tv show, time to be cancelled.

By the way you might want to help out Greg Brewer with a yard sale to pay off hid campaign debt.

 
At June 04, 2007 10:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It sounds like illiterate alderspawn going off to forced community service/jail. What kind of "work" could be out there for you that doesn't require intelligence?
At least Paris Hilton has money.

 
At June 04, 2007 1:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You can't trust Stone. Period.

you can say that again

 
At June 04, 2007 4:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You can't trust the anti-Stone posters. They are motivated by personal animus and/or bigotry and continue to make false accusations 1.5 months after the run-off election.There are Cretins among us!

 
At June 04, 2007 4:11 PM, Blogger Jay said...

Yes, I think we have established that we are a bitterly divided community, and will continue to be as long as Berny Stone is our alderman. I don't expect any of the people on Stone's payroll to change their minds, nor do I expect the regular people to, either. Stone's re-election festers like an open wound that just won't heal.

 
At June 04, 2007 4:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Put salt on it!!

 
At June 04, 2007 4:59 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

53% OF THE "REGULAR PEOPLE" RE-ELECTED STONE--

 
At June 04, 2007 5:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The open wound that festers is the hate by the anti-Stone gang; and Jay,you are doing your best to keep the festering constant and continuous.

 
At June 04, 2007 5:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

you can't trust Berny Stone. You just can't.

you can say that again

 
At June 05, 2007 8:32 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
speaking of yelling, ever heard the one about the boy who cried wolf?

don't you feel just a little silly posting here for almost a year now threatening people with lawsuits?

think that's likely to work, scaring people into silence?

you're a school-yard bully

bring it or shut up

June 01, 2007 9:37 AM


The way you take on bullies is to stand up to them and push back. They can usually dish it out but cant take it like Hugh, Jay, Willow9.

All they do is complain complain, complain, complain and then complain some more. Never any solutions just complaints. Then complain some more.

As for lawsuits, I am working on only one since, I have his necessary information. However I rather start out with avenues than other legal, since there is a basis for them. Hello building violations.
Now back to the cpmplaining

 
At June 05, 2007 9:25 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

your plan is to scare people into silence?

think that's likely to work?

 
At June 05, 2007 9:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I rather start out with avenues than other legal

trouble finding a lawyer to take your case?

 
At June 05, 2007 10:48 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
I rather start out with avenues than other legal

trouble finding a lawyer to take your case?

June 05, 2007 9:26 AM


No actually not. I have one lined up but thanks for asking. How ever why spen money when you can let the goverment work for you.


Anonymous said...
your plan is to scare people into silence?

think that's likely to work?

June 05, 2007 9:25 AM

Plan is to hold people accountable for what they are saying. complain all you want but if you misuse public information or make false accusation, that is not covered by the first admendment.

Clean up your own yard before barking about others.

 
At June 05, 2007 11:09 AM, Blogger Jay said...

It is a frequent tactic by Ald. Stone and his thugs to use everything they can think of to silence his critics. That's what this post was about, the great lengths that Stone will go to eliminate dissent. We need to be honest with ourselves about this: if you "attack" (criticize) Ald. Stone you should expect to be ruthlessly and viciously attacked, through both legal and illegal means. We have seen that time and time again, and no one should expect what appears here to be different. Stone is not exactly an honorable man, who has displayed a conscience. He is a street thug who glorifies mobsters and mob rule here in Chicago, free of the rule of law or constitutional rights.

 
At June 05, 2007 11:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

> I have one lined up

oh, really?

and did your counsel advise you to go ahead and jump online, threaten the subjects of your law suit, let them know it's coming, taunt them, enjoy yourself, have fun with it?

because I'm not a lawyer but if he did, I think you need a new lawyer, I don't think that's anything a real lawyer would say

at first I thought you were just being childish but the more you post the more i am convinced you are in fact a child

 
At June 05, 2007 11:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And here we have a record of the Stoners blatant acts of intimidation. It should be very useful for any countersuit. Jay, I hope you'll keep this up for a very long time, as you never know when it will be needed for legal purposes. BTW, enjoy your posts.

 
At June 05, 2007 12:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jay
You are a JOKE.
You ruthlessly and viciously attacked the alderman because you got a citation for not taking care of your property.Is it your constitutional right not to cut you lawn so rodents can fester and invade you neighbors homes?? Look at your neighbors who dont like you!! Look around at the people who dont like you!! There are plenty of them out there. Take the time to keep up your house.

 
At June 05, 2007 12:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

June 05, 2007 11:16 AM

threaten the subjects of your law suit, let them know it's coming, taunt them, enjoy yourself, have fun with it?at first I thought you were just being childish but the more you post the more i am convinced you are in fact a child


The above paragraph is prime example of what JS, Hugh etc like to do. Take part of a record and then distort it. I took part of this post and pieced it together to create slander.


The following was a nonpaid political annuncement since Dolar, Brewer and everone else is still broke.

 
At June 05, 2007 12:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder what we might find in Stone's freezer wrapped in foil?

 
At June 05, 2007 12:51 PM, Blogger Jay said...

I have not, nor has any property I own, ever been given a "citation" by the alderman, his office or the city of Chicago. You might call this slander, but I'd observe that it is perfectly in keeping with the thuggish behavior of the alderman and his sycophants!

To the comment about me keeping this blog alive, I will do my civic duty. Stone has been unaccountable for too long.

 
At June 05, 2007 1:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jay, we would all be shocked if the Stoners didn't lie about Stone and his opponents. Let it roll off you.

 
At June 05, 2007 2:23 PM, Anonymous Don't Just Stand There said...

I wonder if Stone's supporters still think he is "much beloved" in the 50th Ward. Even they will be better off without him. We would all be better.

 
At June 05, 2007 3:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
I wonder what we might find in Stone's freezer wrapped in foil?

June 05, 2007 12:24 PM


Left overs!!!!
Jay said...
I have not, nor has any property I own, ever been given a "citation" by the alderman, his office or the city of Chicago. You might call this slander, but I'd observe that it is perfectly in keeping with the thuggish behavior of the alderman and his sycophants!

To the comment about me keeping this blog alive, I will do my civic duty. Stone has been unaccountable for too long.

June 05, 2007 12:51 PM

Well now you sound upset. Imagine how and I feel when I get attached an accused of wrong doing when I did nothing. Thats is the whole point with these bloggs. You cant have bith ways.

Now I have to go get something out of my freezer so we can have dinner

 
At June 05, 2007 3:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jay
Ok Maybe you didnt get a citation but that was the next step if you didnt cut that damm lawn. Pretty sad it had to come down to that.If you wernt to busy blogging you could have avoided that. I feel sorry for your neighbors. Be real here lets face the facts you didnt want to keep your property up but the alderman should keep the ward beautiful. He cant do it without the help of the coimmunity either, and that includes you and Hugh with his house.!!

 
At June 05, 2007 6:32 PM, Blogger Jay said...

LOL. You can come over to check my lawn/house any time you want! Bring the rest of your thugs, if you like. No reason not to be neighborly just because you support a corrupt old man who's out of touch with Chicago (when he's awake). I won't try to stop you from exercising your democratic rights, as you have already noticed.

 
At June 06, 2007 7:11 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jay said...
LOL. You can come over to check my lawn/house any time you want! Bring the rest of your thugs, if you like. No reason not to be neighborly just because you support a corrupt old man who's out of touch with Chicago (when he's awake). I won't try to stop you from exercising your democratic rights, as you have already noticed.

June 05, 2007 6:32 PM

Neither will the your so called Stone Thugs.

 
At June 06, 2007 8:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't believe it. All these threats to sue, the Bitch of Staff running Naisy and volunteers off her block, threats to call out city inspectors, etc etc etc - this does not show respect for our rights as citizens. I've seen very little respect for residents in our neighborhood from the people here who support Bernie Stone.

 
At June 06, 2007 10:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

> I get attached an accused of wrong doing when I did nothing.

I'm confused now

are YOU the wronged party or is it the alderman?

 
At June 06, 2007 12:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You have No rights, don’t you know. You’re guilty until proven innocent. Is willow9 chasing people again? I've seen very little respect for residents in our neighborhood for each other..........

 
At June 06, 2007 3:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

> If this is true why doesn't someone orchestrate impeachment against Bernie?

Inauguration day was Monday, May 21, 2007.

20 months into the term our right to elect our own alderman expires.

After January 21, 2009 Mayor Daley assumes the right to appoint a replacement alderman - and we all know how that will go for us!

65 ILCS 5/3.1‑10‑50 Vacancies

Berny needs to hang in there for 19 1/2 more months!

 
At June 06, 2007 3:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't Just Stand There said...
I wonder if Stone's supporters still think he is "much beloved" in the 50th Ward. Even they will be better off without him. We would all be better.

June 05, 2007 2:23 PM

Take a look at this picture,.............................................................................. I am mooning you right now

 
At June 06, 2007 10:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

One thing about about the Stone-Haters-they sure can't take the truth,especially about themselves. What a bunch of bigotted cretins.And why don't the worst of them maintain their properties?

 
At June 11, 2007 9:41 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

why are the biggest bigots in the neighborhood always the ones yelling that they are the victims of racism?

 
At June 12, 2007 5:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Calling a racist /bigot what they are is not being a bigot.What we have here, are LEFT-WING FASCISTS who can't stomach the truth, which is that they are the FASCISTS who respect no one else!! To them it's THEIR WAY or NO WAY!!!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home