Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Naisy Campaign Lies Continue



There seems to be no end to the deceptions played out by Naisy and her campaign. Every Naisy supporter must be Naisy-at-heart. Or at least able to sign her name for Naisy. Each one of these pieces of Naisy literature have a different signature in different hand-writing. But they all claim to be Naisy Dolar. As if Naisy had knocked on their door.

The Dolar campaign's deliberate attempts to deceive voters is sickening. It never seems to end. We have that in Ald. Stone. We don't need another Stone clone.

22 Comments:

At February 13, 2007 11:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tough to tell from your low res photo, but three seem to be the same handwriting. Only the first looks different. Nothing surprising about that since there seem to be at least two Naisys, the fictional candidate and the actual person.

 
At February 13, 2007 11:21 AM, Blogger JS in the 50th said...

You didn't double-click on the photo, did you?

 
At February 13, 2007 12:00 PM, Anonymous Jim in Chicago said...

I don't get this. When we used to do this for Dean, we were told to sign our OWN names to our hand-written "sorry I missed you" note on the lit. Why would any campaign try to pass off its supporters as the candidate herself? It's far too easy to disprove, as your post shows.

 
At February 13, 2007 12:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

fascinating. Noone is trying to BE N Dolar when they write on the cards. They are trying to put a human face on an election process that is almost automatic. IF this is the only 'evidence of a lie' that you can find on this campaign then I would hate to see what you would find on a candidate or politician that really 'lies'. Have you ever worked on a campaign for any candidate outside the ward?

 
At February 13, 2007 12:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Naisy Dolar has now stooped to "CRASHING" OTHER PEOPLE'S EVENTS.YESTERDAY,at the GROUNDBREAKING for the Devon-Rockwell condo/garage(which is a great boon to the community),an achievement by ALDERMAN STONE,WHICH ADDS 230 NEW PARKING SPACES, RELIEVING CONGESTION AND AIDING THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY,DOLAR SHOWED UP TO BASK IN THE AURA OF STONE'S ACHIEVEMENT.Can one get any lower class?

 
At February 13, 2007 12:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

not surprising from a campaign based on mis-information that is a personality cult of NAISY

 
At February 13, 2007 12:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have you nothing else better to do than pick on inane little things? Lies? Do you know there are WORSE - much WORSE lies in other campaigns (past and present)? Do you (meaning JS and the other commentors here) honestly think that these "lies" you associate with this campaign is equivalent to the lies and other terrible things Stone and other people of power who are poor leaders have done to their people?

Directors, presidents and other people in leadership have staff members write speeches and memos. They then will look over it and make their changes and approve it.

Is this the opposition (none-Stone related obviously) trying to disprove the ND campaign? I think this is so petty that I'm leaning toward Naisy.

 
At February 13, 2007 1:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There was a person at my door with literature wearing that yellow hat and I know for a fact it wasnt Naisy, so the proof is there that she truly is not signing these pieces of literature, unless they are pre signed. LOL
I agree Naisy has put out many lies. She has not lived in the ward for more than 10 years as prior to that her house was being rented out for several years. Thats a fact.

 
At February 13, 2007 1:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"There was a person at my door with literature wearing that yellow hat and I know for a fact it wasnt Naisy, so the proof is there that she truly is not signing these pieces of literature, unless they are pre signed."

Yes, obviously, fellow resident that it wasn't the candidate herself. These individuals you speak of are canvassers just as there are other canvassers out there for other campaigns.

 
At February 13, 2007 1:38 PM, Blogger JS in the 50th said...

I am not personally comfortable with the "Stone does it, so it must be ok" approach. I would like to elect someone who does not use Stone's tactics in order to win. And we have a good shot at that with Greg Brewer.

I will admit, though, that this is not the worst thing we've seen in Chicago politics. But I thought we had gotten beyond machine tactics. Or at least I hoped so.

 
At February 13, 2007 1:38 PM, Blogger Hugh said...

One of my neighbors recently told me:

"I'm leaning toward Naisy. I was impressed that she actually stopped by my house to personally introduce herself. I wasn't home, but I was still impressed."

 
At February 13, 2007 1:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't understand how this is "machine tactics"? You're telling me that other opposition campaigns don't have a group of supporters and volunteers who believe in their candidates that they wouldn't help them? I think from what I observe people are drawn to Naisy because she is charimastic, personable and concentrates on the residents' needs. Not special interests.

What you have highlighted is such minor issue in the grand scheme of things.

 
At February 13, 2007 1:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's surprising that someone - after meeting Naisy - is leaning towards her.

For the most part the individuals I have spoken to are turned off by her approach.

 
At February 13, 2007 1:59 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Most of hugh's neighbors wouldnt' talk to him because he is not a nice man and his building is a blight on the block.hugh is as phony as they come when he plays his "good neighbor act" and now he is shilling for another fraud,NAISY DOLAR!

 
At February 13, 2007 2:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

WOW! HUGH AND NAISY DOLAR-GUESS BREWER'S CAMPAIGN WOULDNT'T LET HUGH BE CAPTAIN,SO THIS ANTI-STONE FANATIC IS NOW OPENLY FOR DOLAR(OR HINTING AT IT)

 
At February 13, 2007 4:43 PM, Blogger JS in the 50th said...

I admit to being astonished as to why other people ignore a candidate's integrity, or don't think that it is a critical issue in this election. We disagree. It is a real issue.

 
At February 13, 2007 8:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Canvassers should NOT sign the candidates name, this fraud. DONT mislead people letting them think Naisy the candidate was at their house.

 
At February 13, 2007 8:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said... February 13, 2007 12:19 PM

A response to you:

Was that a Berny Stone Re-election event? OR rather was it a COMMUNITY Event where Berny was just a honorable Guest?

There were many people from the COMMUNITY, not just Stone supporters, and Naisy has full right to come as a member of the community. Well that is another question as to if you consider her a member or not, but it was an OPEN COMMUNITY event.

and anyways, yeah great project, I support it fully, great for alderman stone to support it and see it through, hm but still it was fishy that this project has been in the works for about a year or so, and he brings it to the spotlight just 2 weeks before the election. This action just tarnishes a great achievement as critics will jump at this. However the project itself is optimistic, the timing was not.

 
At February 13, 2007 11:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let's see, four different signatures and styles of writing. I think I've solved the mystery: Naisy can write with both of her hands and both of her feet.

--

 
At February 13, 2007 11:14 PM, Anonymous AppleGirl said...

J.S., first off, you can't say that folks are not interested in integrity. Let's start with your integrity--you are totally exagerating and lying about Naisy and you don't use your real name. Just because we don't agree with your views doesn't mean we don't care about integrity. Take the signatures, for example. To me, all but one look like they are the same. And the different one could even be the difference between printing and manuscript.

 
At February 14, 2007 10:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wait allthough Naisy signatures must be Stone and his thugs

 
At February 14, 2007 2:48 PM, Blogger JS in the 50th said...

AppleGirl says I don't have integrity because "you don't use your real name." OK. Should I ask if AppleGirl is your real name, or can we just slide over to discuss your hypocrisy?

As for the signatures, you are seeing what you want to see. The signatures are very different, and done by a different hand. Naisy's campaign is encouraging deception of 50th voters. So sad.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home